What it is
A concept map is a drawing of an idea. Each concept goes in a box or circle. Lines connect related concepts, and each line has a short label that says how they are related, such as "causes", "is part of" or "leads to". Read from one box to another along a line and you get a short sentence, like "Evaporation leads to clouds".
The labels are the key part. A web of boxes with no labels is just a picture. Writing the label makes you decide what the link actually is, and that is where much of the thinking happens.
Concept maps came out of work by Joseph Novak in the 1970s and are used in science classes in particular. They are good for seeing how a topic fits together. They are not very good for memorizing lists of facts or word-for-word definitions. A map can be drawn on paper, on a whiteboard or with a free program, and each works fine. Paper is often best at first, because you can redraw it quickly when you change your mind. Many students find their first maps are messy. That is normal, and a messy map that you made yourself is worth more than a clean one you copied. Plan to redraw it at least once, since the second version usually shows the structure much more clearly than the first.
When to use it
- You can name the facts of a topic but cannot explain how they fit together.
- A chapter has many terms that overlap, such as ecosystems, economics or the parts of a cell.
- You are preparing for an essay question or a question that asks why or how.
- You want a review tool that is more visual than a list of notes.
How to apply it
- Pick a clear topic or question for the map, such as "How does the heart move blood?" A focus question keeps the map from growing too big.
- List 8 to 15 key concepts from your notes. Write each as a word or short phrase.
- Put the most general concept at the top or center. Place related concepts around it, with more specific ones further out.
- Draw lines between concepts that are connected. On every line, write a short verb or phrase to say how they connect.
- Look for cross-links between different parts of the map, such as a line from one branch to another. These often show real understanding.
- Check the map by reading each link as a sentence. If it does not make sense, change the label or the line.
- Later, redraw the map from memory on a blank page and compare it to your first version. Add what you missed.
Step-by-step examples
Example: a map for the water cycle
- The student writes "Water cycle" in the center and adds boxes: sun, ocean, vapor, clouds, rain, rivers, groundwater.
- She draws "sun" to "ocean" with the label "heats".
- She draws "ocean" to "vapor" with "evaporates into", and "vapor" to "clouds" with "cools and condenses into".
- She adds "rain" to "rivers" with "collects in", and a cross-link from "groundwater" back to "rivers" with "feeds".
- Two days later she draws it again from memory. She forgot groundwater, so she adds a review note.
Example: a map for causes of the American Revolution
- A student writes the question "Why did colonists rebel?" and lists concepts: taxes, Stamp Act, no representation, Boston Tea Party, British troops.
- He links "Stamp Act" to "taxes" with "is a kind of", and "taxes" to "no representation" with "angered colonists because of".
- He links "Boston Tea Party" to "taxes" with "protested", and to "British troops" with "led to more".
- He sees that the map has no link between troops and the Stamp Act and checks his textbook to see if there should be one.
- He uses the map to plan a one-page essay outline.
Advantages
- It makes you think about relationships, not just terms.
- It shows gaps in understanding, such as concepts you cannot link.
- It can be a good planning step before writing an essay.
- Visual summaries are quick to review the night before a test.
Limitations
- It takes more time than a list, and a big map can become messy.
- It does not train you to recall details from memory unless you redraw it blank.
- Students who copy a map from a textbook without thinking get little from it.
- It is a poor fit for material with little structure, such as a list of dates or vocabulary.
Common mistakes
- Leaving the lines unlabeled, so the map shows only which words are near each other.
- Putting every concept from the chapter on one giant map.
- Spending an hour making the map look nice instead of thinking about the links.
- Studying a finished map by looking at it, without trying to recall it.
- Using mapping as the only method, with no practice questions.
Related methods
Outline Notes: Organize Ideas in Levels
Outline notes use indents and short lines to show main ideas and details. Learn how to write them, when they fit a lecture and where they break down.
5 min read
Elaborative Interrogation: Ask Why Questions
Elaborative interrogation means asking why a fact is true and answering it yourself. See how to use it, examples, and when it works less well.
5 min read
Active Recall: Study by Pulling Information Out of Memory
Active recall means testing yourself instead of rereading. Learn what it is, when it fits, how to apply it step by step, and where it falls short.
5 min read
The Feynman Technique: Learn by Explaining Simply
The Feynman Technique means explaining a topic in plain words to find gaps in your understanding. See the steps, examples and where it falls short.
6 min read
Recommended next steps
References
- Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448.
- Schroeder, N. L., Nesbit, J. C., Anguiano, C. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2018). Studying and constructing concept maps: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 431-455.
- Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.
This guide is general educational information. Study methods work differently for different people, and no method guarantees better grades or results.